Field study of installation damage for geosynthetic clay liners

Citation
Pj. Fox et al., Field study of installation damage for geosynthetic clay liners, GEOSYNTH IN, 5(5), 1998, pp. 491-520
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Civil Engineering
Journal title
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
10726349 → ACNP
Volume
5
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
491 - 520
Database
ISI
SICI code
1072-6349(1998)5:5<491:FSOIDF>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Field tests were conducted to assess installation damage for an adhesive-bo nded, and a needle-punched, geosynthetic clay liner (GCL). GCL panels were laid on a prepared subgrade and covered to varying thicknesses with clean a ngular sand and clean angular gravel. After hydration, bulldozers were driv en over the test plots. GCL samples were then carefully exhumed and laborat ory tests were performed to assess damage according to product type, cover soil type, cover soil thickness, bulldozer type, and number of bulldozer pa sses after hydration. Visual observations and laboratory test results indic ated that the products generally performed well during installation. Damage to the geosynthetic components of the GCLs was minor for a cover soil thic kness of 305 mm or greater. Mass per unit area measurements indicated that bentonite migration was insignificant for nearly all specimens; the only ex ception was the adhesive-bonded GCL covered with gravel and subjected to 10 passes of a medium-weight bulldozer after hydration. No failures were obse rved for installation conditions that met the guidelines of ASTM D 6102 and the manufacturer. Compared to similar investigations for other geosyntheti c materials, installation damage studies for GCLs are unique because of the sensitivity of these products to hydration and overburden stress condition s and the need to quantify bentonite migration due to stress concentrations .