13-cis-retinoic acid or all-trans-retinoic acid plus inteferon-alpha in recurrent cervical cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group phase II randomized trial
Gr. Weiss et al., 13-cis-retinoic acid or all-trans-retinoic acid plus inteferon-alpha in recurrent cervical cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group phase II randomized trial, GYNECOL ONC, 71(3), 1998, pp. 386-390
Purpose. Preclinical and clinical data support the study of retinoids and i
nterferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the uter
ine cenix (SCC). This phase II randomized trial of the Southwest Oncology G
roup sought to estimate the response rate for IFN-alpha plus either 13-cis-
retinoic acid (13cRA) or all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) in women with recur
rent cervical SCC,
Patients and Methods. Eligibility for this trial required bidimensionally m
easurable locally recurrent or metastatic squamous or adenosquamous carcino
ma of the uterine cervix; SWOG performance status of less than or equal to
2; no prior interferon, retinoids, or chemotherapy (except as radiation sen
sitization), All but two patients were previously treated with surgery, rad
iation therapy, or both. After randomization, patients received IFN-alpha-2
A (subcutaneous injection; 3 x 10(6) units/m(2)/day) plus either 13cRA (1 m
g/kg/day orally) or ATRA (150 mg/m(2)/day orally) in two equally divided do
ses.
Results. Total enrollment was 63 patients, 21 in the ATRA arm, 42 in the 13
cRA arm. Three patients were ineligible, 1 in the ATRA arm, 2 in the 13cRA
arm, Each arm had 1 patient who received no assigned treatment and was not
evaluated for response or toxicity. The ATRA/IFN-alpha response rate was 5%
(1/19; 95% confidence interval = 0.1-26%), consisting of 1 partial respons
e lasting 4 weeks. The 13cRA/IFN-alpha response rate was 8% (3/39; 95% conf
idence interval = 2-21%), consisting of 3 partial responses lasting 17, 22,
and 24 weeks, respectively. All confirmed responses were partial. One addi
tional unconfirmed partial response occurred in the 13cRA arm. Both regimen
s were generally well-tolerated and produced toxicities (principally malais
e and fatigue) associated with each constituent agent's known single-agent
side effects.
Conclusion. Based upon the results of this study, neither regimen can be re
commended for further study in patients previously treated with radiation t
herapy. (C) 1998 Academic Press.