Prevalence and risk factors for nosocomial infections in four university hospitals in Switzerland

Citation
D. Pittet et al., Prevalence and risk factors for nosocomial infections in four university hospitals in Switzerland, INFECT CONT, 20(1), 1999, pp. 37-42
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
ISSN journal
0899823X → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
37 - 42
Database
ISI
SICI code
0899-823X(199901)20:1<37:PARFFN>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and risk factors for nosocomial infe ctions (NIs) in four Swiss university hospitals. DESIGN AND SETTING: A 1-week period-prevalence survey conducted in May 1996 in medical, surgical, and intensive-care wards of four Swiss university ho spitals (900-1,500 beds). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defini tions were used, except that asymptomatic bacteriuria was not categorized a s NI. Study variables included patient demographics, primary diagnosis, com orbidities, exposure to medical and surgical risk factors, and use of antim icrobials. Risk factors for NIs were determined using logistic regression w ith adjustment for length of hospital stay, study center, device use, and p atients' comorbidities. RESULTS: 176 NI were recorded in 156 of 1,349 screened patients (11.6%; int erhospital range, 9.8%-13.5%). The most frequent NI was surgical-site infec tion (53; 30%), followed by urinary tract infection (39; 22%), lower respir atory tract infection (27; 15%), and bloodstream infection (23; 13%). Preva lence of NI was higher in critical-care units (25%) than in medical (9%) an d surgical wards (12%). Overall, 65% of NIs were culture-proven; the leadin g pathogens were Enterobacteriaceae (44; 28%), Staphylococcus aureus (20; 1 3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17; 11%), and Candida species (16; 10%). Indep endent risk factors for NI were central Venous catheter (CVC) use (odds rat io [OR], 3.35; 95% confidence interval [GI(95)], 2.91-3.80), admission to i ntensive care (OR 1.75; CI95, 1.30-2,21), emergency admission (OR 1.57; CI9 5, 1.15-2.00), impaired functional status (Karnofsky index 1-4: OR, 2.56; C I95, 1.95-3.17), and McCabe classification of ultimately fatal (OR, 2.50; C I95, 2.04-2.96) or rapidly fatal (OR, 2.25; CI95, 1.52-2.98) underlying con dition: CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this survey, NIs are frequent in S wiss university hospitals. This investigation confirms the importance of CV Cs as a major risk factor for NI. Patient comorbidities must be taken into account to adjust for case mix in any study comparing interhospital or intr ahospital infection rates.