Would you say you "had sex" if ... ?

Citation
Sa. Sanders et Jm. Reinisch, Would you say you "had sex" if ... ?, J AM MED A, 281(3), 1999, pp. 275-277
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
ISSN journal
00987484 → ACNP
Volume
281
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
275 - 277
Database
ISI
SICI code
0098-7484(19990120)281:3<275:WYSY"S>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Context The current public debate regarding whether oral sex constitutes ha ving "had sex" or sexual relations has reflected a lack of empirical data o n how Americans as a population define these terms. Objective To determine which interactions individuals would consider as hav ing" had sex." Methods A question was included in a survey conducted in 1991 that explored sexual behaviors and attitudes among a random stratified sample of 599 stu dents representative of the undergraduate population of a state university in the Midwest. Participants The participants originated from 29 states, including all 4 US Census Bureau geographic regions. Approximately 79% classified themselves as politically moderate to conservative. Main Outcome Measure Percentage of respondents who believed the interaction described constituted having "had sex." Results individual attitudes varied regarding behaviors defined as having " had sex": 59% (95% confidence interval, 54%-63%) of respondents indicated t hat oral-genital contact did not constitute having "had sex" with a partner , Nineteen percent responded similarly regarding penile-anal intercourse. Conclusions The findings support the view that Americans hold widely diverg ent opinions about what behaviors do and do not constitute having "had sex. ".