An analysis of the 1997 Geoacoustic Inversion Workshop test case data was c
arried out to benchmark the performance of a Genetic Algorithm (GA) inversi
on code called SAGA_INV.(1) The inversion program made use of Westwood's OR
CA propagation model,(2) FORTRAN subroutines, and Interactive Data Language
(Research Systems Inc. IDL). SAGA_INV is capable of performing inversions
with either Simulated Annealing (SA) or GA optimization schemes; however, o
nly the GA portion of the code has been benchmarked with the workshop test
cases at the present time. Not all of the workshop test cases were processe
d: this study was concerned only with the GAL, SD, SO, AT, and WA data sets
. The CAL data was processed using three different cost functions: (i) stan
dard Bartlett processor, (ii) a broadband coherent processor, and (iii) a t
ransmission loss mismatch function. These processors were applied to three
frequency bands: (i) 76 frequencies between 25 Hz and 100 Hz, (ii) nine fre
quencies between 28 Hz and 36 Hz, and (iii) 13 frequencies between 44 Hz an
d 56 Hz. The latter two frequency regimes were intended to simulate 1/3-oct
ave bands centered at 32 Hz and 50 Hz, respectively. Four different receivi
ng arrays were simulated: (i) a 1550 m aperture horizontal, bottom mounted
array at approximately I-km range, (ii) a similar array at approximately 4.
2-km range, (iii) a 55-m aperture la-dement vertical array located at l-km
range, and (iv) a similar vertical array at 5-km range. In addition to proc
essing the CAL data set, all three subcases of the SD, SO, AT, and WA data
sets were also processed; however, only the transmission loss cost function
and the two simulated 1/3-octave bands were considered for these test case
s.