In-depth interviews with thirteen white and thirteen black sorority members
at two college campuses show that white sororities encourage romantic pair
ings ("getting a man") evidenced by their extensive social affairs and form
al recognitions for women who achieve relationship milestones, while black
sororities focus on careers and community service ("getting ahead") evidenc
ed by their reliance on sorority alumnae for career networking and by their
extensive involvement in community service. The authors argue that the key
to understanding the variation lies in the different histories and current
structural positions of the groups. For black sororities, historic images
of strong, independent black women and the modern reality of black female m
arriage and poverty rates have shaped the sorority structure. White sororit
ies have emphasized finding a man as a source of support, an orientation at
odds both with a modern reality that dictates labor force participation fo
r all women and with members' career aspirations.