Prognostic significance of CT contrast enhancement within histological subgroups of intracranial glioma

Citation
K. Lote et al., Prognostic significance of CT contrast enhancement within histological subgroups of intracranial glioma, J NEURO-ONC, 40(2), 1998, pp. 161-170
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
0167594X → ACNP
Volume
40
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
161 - 170
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-594X(199811)40:2<161:PSOCCE>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
We report the prognostic significance of tumor CT contrast enhancement with in histological subgroups in 831 consecutive adult glioma patients of high- grade (n = 516) and low-grade (n = 315) histology. In the present report, a negative prognostic factor is associated with shortened survival. Methods: Survival analysis including Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank tests, Cox analys is, and Aalen's linear model as implemented in SPSS and S-PLUS. Results: Se nsitivity and specificity of contrast enhancement as a test for high-grade glioma was 0.87 and 0.79, respectively. Enhancement was a strong negative p rognostic factor comparable to high-grade histology in the total patient po pulation. Enhancement was also a negative prognostic factor within the subg roups adult high-grade (Grade 3-4), anaplastic (Grade 3), and low-grade (Gr ade 1-2) gliomas (p < 0.001). The prognostic implications of initial enhanc ement declined in high-grade patients surviving beyond 36 months. Tumor con trast enhancement or calcifications (in parentheses) were present in 96% (3 .6%) of glioblastomas, in 87% (7.4%) of high-grade gliomas, in 56.5% of ana plastic gliomas, and in 21% (16.2%) of low-grade gliomas. Calcification was a positive prognostic factor within the high-grade group of patients (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Enhancement was a major prognostic factor comparable t o high-grade: histology in this glioma patient population. Enhancement was a negative prognostic factor within each of the adult subgroups high-grade, anaplastic (grade 3), and low-grade gliomas. Enhancement was strongly asso ciated with but not pathognomonic for high-grade histology.