Sj. Kim et al., Ca2+ influx through carbachol-activated non-selective cation channels in guinea-pig gastric myocytes, J PHYSL LON, 513(3), 1998, pp. 749-760
1. Ca2+ microfluorometry (100 mu M K-5 fura-2) and the voltage-clamp techni
que were combined to study the effect of carbachol (CCh, 50 mu M) in induci
ng currents (I-CCh) through nonselective cation channels (NSCCCh) and incre
ments in global cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (Delta[Ca2+](c)).
2. In Na+-containing bath solution, I-CCh fell from an initial phasic to a
subsequent small (5 %) tonic component; Delta[Ca2+](c) fell to zero. Tonic
I-CCh and [Ca2+](c) became prominent after substitution of extracellular 1.
40 mM Na+ by 140 mM Cs+. Tonic I-CCh and Delta[Ca2+], were insensitive to i
ntracellular heparin (3 mg ml(-1)) and ryanodine (4 mu M), i.e, they did no
t depend on Ca2+ release from sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR).
3. Single channel currents of NSCCCh could be resolved in whole-cell record
ings. Substitution of Na+ by Cs+ increased NSCCCh activity by one order of
magnitude and slope conductance from 22 to 30 pS. Extracellular quinidine (
3 mu M) reversibly blocked the NSCCCh activity.
4. Both tonic I-CCh and tonic Delta[Ca2+](c) (a) followed a similar time co
urse of activation, desensitization and facilitation, (b) were reversibly b
locked by 3 mu M quinidine, and (c) persisted upon block of SR Ca2+ release
.
5. A Ca2+ fractional current of tonic I-CCh (f(Ca)) of 0.009 was calculated
by comparing the ratio Delta[Ca2+](c) (corrected for simultaneous Ca2+ red
istribution) over I-CCh with depolarization-induced *Delta[Ca2+](c) (Delta[
Ca2+](c) calculated from I-Ca induced by a 400 ms depolarization from -60 t
o 0 mV at 2 mM [Ca2+](o), 145 mM [Cs+](o)) over I-Ca. f(Ca) was 0.023 at [C
a2+](o) = 4 mM.
6. With 110 mM extracellular CaCl2 and 1.45 mM intracellular CsCl, I-CCh re
versed at +19.5 mV suggesting a permeability ratio P-Ca/P-Cs of 2.8.
7. We conclude that Ca2+ influx through NSCCCh under physiological [Ca2+](o
) could induce Delta[Ca2+](c). The f(Ca) was, however, much smaller than th
e one calculated from the reversal potential.