The aim of this paper is to identify the controls on the rates of illitizat
ion in Texas Gulf Coast shales under diagenetic conditions. Two different m
ineral transformations are considered: the transformation of smectite to (n
early) illite and the precipitation of discrete illite, i.e., the formation
of pure illite,
Analyses of potassium feldspar and kaolinite abundance, in addition to K2O,
Al2O3, and TiO2 contents, in shales from three wells are used to supplemen
t published data in order to identify the mineral reactions responsible for
the smectite-to illite transformation in shales involving illite/smectite
(I/S) mineral series. These data indicate that the first stage of the smect
ite-to-illite reaction in shales (R = 0 structures, ca, 0-50% illite conten
t) is controlled by the presence of feldspar and hence also by the dissolut
ion kinetics of feldspar, The empirically derived activation energy for the
first I/S transformation in shales is similar to that for K-feldspar disso
lution, Kaolinite is not involved in this transformation in the shales inve
stigated. The second stage of the reaction sequence (R = 1 structures, ca,
50-100% illite content) occurs after potassium feldspar has largely or comp
letely disappeared from the shale system. This indicates that the feldspar
no longer controls the second stage of the smectite-to-illite transformatio
n, and suggests another, external, source of potassium for the reaction in
the shales, This assumption is supported by the relative increase of potass
ium content of the shales, at least in two of the three studied weds, Kaoli
nite does not seem to be involved either in this second stage of the I/S re
action sequence.
The formation of discrete illite crystallites in shales is independent of t
he I/S transformation reactions and takes place only after a very significa
nt period of time has elapsed, The slow rate of this reaction reflects the
low activity of potassium in solutions that are in equilibrium with shale,
in comparison with sandstones, where a rapid precipitation of pure illite c
an in some cases be observed.
It is suggested that the different reactions in the smectite-to-illite tran
sformation necessitate different sources of potassium either from within or
outside an argillaceous whole-rock system. These different sources of pota
ssium give rise to different rates for the I/S conversion reaction and the
formation of illite.