Long-term functional outcome after intensive care

Citation
Vml. Roche et al., Long-term functional outcome after intensive care, J AM GER SO, 47(1), 1999, pp. 18-24
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
ISSN journal
00028614 → ACNP
Volume
47
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
18 - 24
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8614(199901)47:1<18:LFOAIC>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although age-related mortality after intensive care unit (ICU) a dmission has been studied, functional recovery for different age groups fol lowing ICU admission is not well characterized. We hypothesized that compar ed with younger age groups, fewer patients older than age 65 admitted to an ICU would regain their full prehospitalization functional ability and that their recovery would be slower than that of younger patients. DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort study with convenience sampling. SETTING: Intensive care units of an urban university-affiliated Veterans Ad ministration Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 222 patients during the first 72 hours after entry to a medical or surgical ICU at the Denver Veteran's Administration Medica l Center between September 1991 and July 1992. MEASUREMENTS: We collected baseline data on patient demographics and on the severity of acute illness using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Ev aluation (APACHE II), Acute Physiology Score (APS), and functional status ( highest level of physical activity level 1 month before admission). We reco rded survival and patient-perceived global functional status at 6 weeks and 6 months after admission. Post-ICU function was adjusted for baseline func tion, age, APACHE II, and APS using multiple regression. RESULTS: Average patient age was 62 +/- .74 years (mean +/- SEM). Fifty-two percent of the entire cohort returned to baseline function at 6 months. Al though baseline function was better for younger people, there was no differ ence in recovery at 6 weeks in older compared with younger patients. Most f unctional recovery occurred by 6 weeks, with maintenance of this recovery a t 6 months. Baseline function was the major determinant of both 6 week reco very (P <.001) and 6 month recovery (P =.002), whereas APACHE II was not (P =.3). Age predicted recovery significantly (P =.04) at 6 months but not at 6 weeks (P =.26). APACHE II (P <.001) and baseline function (P =.03) predi cted mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Older people had worse functional ability at I CU admission, but the proportion of older people who recovered and their ra te of recovery was the same as for younger people. Baseline functional stat us, rather than abnormal physiologic status (as measured by APACHE II) on a dmission, was the major determinant of recovery, whereas APACHE II was the main correlate of mortality. Together, baseline function and physiologic st atus provide valuable complementary information for clinically relevant out comes following an ICU admission.