Hc. Whittle et al., Effect of subclinical infection on maintaining immunity against measles invaccinated children in West Africa, LANCET, 353(9147), 1999, pp. 98-102
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background Despite a high coverage with measles vaccines in parts of west A
frica, epidemics of measles occur with reduced severity in an increasing pr
oportion of older children who have been vaccinated. We examined the effect
of exposure to natural measles on immunity in vaccinated children.
Methods Our study was carried out in 1992 during an epidemic of measles in
Niakhar, a rural area of Senegal with about 27 000 inhabitants who mostly l
ive in compounds that include several households; within each household peo
ple live in different huts. Vaccine coverage in Niakhar was 81% at the time
of our study. We measured haemagglutinin-inhibiting antibody at exposure a
nd twice thereafter (after 4-5 weeks and at 6 months) in 36 vaccinated and
87 unvaccinated children. The frequency of measles and subclinical measles-
defined as a four-fold or greater rise in antibody titre without clinical s
igns or symptoms-was related to intensity of exposure according to whether
the index case was in the same hut, household, or compound.
Findings Clinical measles occurred in 20 (56%) of 36 unvaccinated children
and in one (1%) of 87 vaccinated children. Subclinical measles occurred in
39 (45%) of 86 vaccinated children who were exposed to measles and in four
(25%) of 16 unvaccinated children. The frequency was inversely related to p
re-exposure antibody concentration (p<0.001 for trend) and directly related
to intensity of exposure (p=0.002 for trend), Antibody concentrations in s
ubclinical cases increased on average by 45-fold and remained raised for at
least 6 months.
Interpretation Increased antibody titre after subclinical measles may be co
mmon in vaccinated children in West Africa where the intensity of exposure
is high. As measles vaccination coverage increases, the circulation of wild
measles will decrease, and vaccine-induced antibody is less likely to be b
oosted. Thus, new epidemics, albeit milder in form, may occur in vaccinated
areas which should be recognised in campaigns to eradicate measles.