Objective. The controversy over the incidence of developmental dysplasia of
the hip (DDH) stems mainly from an ambiguity of criteria for defining a ge
nuinely pathologic neonatal hip. In this study, we evaluate an algorithm we
devised for the treatment of DDH, for its ability to identify those neonat
al hips which, if left untreated, would develop any kind of dysplasia and,
therefore, are to be included in the determination of DDH incidence.
Methods. Clinical and ultrasonographic examinations for DDH were performed
on 18 060 consecutive neonatal hips at 1 to 3 days of life. Newborns with s
keletal deformities, neurologic/muscular disorders, and neural tube defects
were excluded. Hips that featured any type of sonographic pathology were r
eexamined at 2 or 6 weeks, depending on the severity of the findings. Only
hips in which the initial pathology was not improved or had deteriorated we
re treated; all others were examined periodically until the age of 12 month
s.
Results. Sonographic screening of 18 060 hips detected 1001 instances of de
viation from normal, indicating a sonographic DDH incidence of 55.1 per 100
0. However, only 90 hips remained abnormal and required treatment indicatin
g a true DDH incidence of 5 per 1000 hips. All the others evolved into norm
al hips, and no additional instances of DDH were found on follow-up through
out the 12 months.
Conclusions. The implementation of our protocol enables us to distinguish t
wo categories of neonatal hip pathology: one that eventually develops into
a normal hip (essentially sonographic DDH); and another that will deteriora
te into a hip with some kind of dysplasia, including full dislocation (true
DDH). This approach seems to allow for a better-founded definition of DDH,
for an appropriate determination of its incidence, for decision-making reg
arding treatment, and for assessment of the cost-effectiveness of screening
programs for the early detection of DDH.