Progress through the division cycle of present day eukaryotic cells is cont
rolled by a complex network consisting of(i) cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs
) and their associated cyclins, (ii) kinases and phosphatases that regulate
CDK activity, and (iii) stoichiometric inhibitors that sequester cyclin-CD
K dimers. Presumably regulation of cell division in the earliest ancestors
of eukaryotes was a considerably simpler affair. Nasmyth (1995) recently pr
oposed a mechanism for control of a putative, primordial, eukaryotic cell c
ycle, based on antagonistic interactions between a cyclin-CDK and the anaph
ase promoting complex (APC) that labels the cyclin subunit for proteolysis.
We recast this idea in mathematical form and show that the model exhibits
hysteretic behaviour between alternative steady states: a G1-like state (AP
C on, CDK activity low, DNA unreplicated and replication complexes assemble
d) and an S/M-like state (APC off, CDK activity high,:DNA replicated and re
plication complexes disassembled). In our model, the transition from G1 to
S/M ('Start') is driven by cell growth, and the reverse transition ('Finish
') is driven by completion of DNA synthesis and proper alignment of chromos
omes on the metaphase plate. This simple and effective mechanism for coupli
ng growth and division and for accurately copying and partitioning a genome
consisting of numerous chromosomes, each with multiple origins of replicat
ion, could represent the core of the eukaryotic cell cycle. Furthermore, we
show how other controls could be added to this core and speculate on the r
easons why stoichiometric inhibitors and CDK inhibitory phosphorylation mig
ht have been appended to the primitive alternation between cyclin accumulat
ion and degradation.