RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT, MORULA MORPHOLOGY, AND CELL ALLOCATION TO INNER CELL MASS AND TROPHECTODERM IN IN VITRO-PRODUCED BOVINE EMBRYOS
A. Vansoom et al., RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT, MORULA MORPHOLOGY, AND CELL ALLOCATION TO INNER CELL MASS AND TROPHECTODERM IN IN VITRO-PRODUCED BOVINE EMBRYOS, Molecular reproduction and development, 47(1), 1997, pp. 47-56
Noninvasive measurements of bovine embryo quality, such as timing of c
leavage, morula morphology, blastocyst formation, and hatching ability
, were linked with the number of inner cell mass (ICM) cells and troph
ectoderm (TE) cells of the resulting embryos. First, it was confirmed
that fast-cleaving embryos proved to have significantly higher chances
to reach advanced developmental stages vs. intermediate and slow clea
vers (P = 0.01). They also showed significantly less fragmentation at
the morula stage, implying the presence of more excellent morulae amon
g fast-cleaving embryos (P < 0.05). Second, the quality of hatched bla
stocysts, resulting from morulae of different morphological grades, wa
s examined by differential staining. The total cell and ICM cell numbe
rs were significantly lower for hatched blastocysts developed from poo
r morulae compared to hatched blastocysts developed from excellent, go
od, or fair morulae. However, hatched blastocysts with < 10 ICM cells
were seen in embryos belonging to all four morphological scores. Final
ly, it was found that timing of first cleavage was not significantly c
orrelated with timing of blastocyst formation or with cell number of b
lastocysts. Timing of blastocyst formation, however, was significantly
correlated with cell number: day 8 blastocysts had significantly lowe
r total cell and ICM cell numbers than day 6 and day 7 blastocysts (P
< 0.001). These results suggest that the quality of in vitro-produced
bovine embryos is very variable and cannot be linked with a single cri
terion such as embryo morphology and/or hatching ability. Timing of bl
astocyst formation was the most valuable criterion with regard to embr
yonic differentiation. (C) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.