Objectives To examine whether internal tocography results in a better obste
tric outcome than external tocography in cases where labor is augmented wit
h oxytocin infusion.
Methods In 127 nulliparous women who were delivered in our clinic, labor wa
s augmented with oxytocin infusion due to slow progress. The patients were
randomly selected (every second case) to be monitored by either external or
internal tocography.
Results The two groups of patients had similar cervical dilatation (4.0 +/-
0.7 cm vs. 4.0 +/- 0.8 cm) when oxytocin infusion was started and the mean
total and maximum oxytocin doses were also similar (maximum dose 10.2 +/-
6 vs. 11.1 +/- 7 mU/min; mean total dose 2.1 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.6 IU). T
here was no statistical difference in cases where oxytocin was reduced due
to hyperstimulation (10.4% vs. 8.33%) or difference in length of labor (236
+/- 87 vs. 240 +/- 92 min), uterine activity integral units (1820 +/- 289
vs. 1910 +/- 322), mode of delivery (normal delivery 82.1% vs. 78.3%; vacuu
m 10.4% vs. 11.7%, Cesarean section 7.5% vs. 10.0%) and obstetric outcome b
etween the groups. Neonatal status, as assessed by 5-min Apgar scores and u
mbilical vein pH was similar in both groups. No assisted ventilation or adm
ission to the neonatal intensive care unit was needed. The mean birth weigh
t was also similar in both groups (3.5 +/- 0.4 vs. 3.4 +/- 0.6 kg).
Conclusions Both groups of parturients were adequately monitored by both me
thods. We found no apparent advantages of internal over external tocography
. There were no differences in mode of delivery as well as in newborn statu
s.