Analyzing proposed treatments: The large body of literature on substitution
treatments for drug abusers describes a variety of social settings and an
extremely heterogeneous set of protocols. Establishing correlations between
protocols and practical applications is thus a difficult task.
Methadone: The most widely studied substance is methadone. With methadone t
reatment there is a decline in the amount of heroin used and in the number
of injections. But there is no response with other drugs, leading to a real
risk of increasing cocaine abuse. Methadone is used as a tool to decrease
the risk of HIV although its impact is difficult to quantify. The most sign
ificant effect of methadone treatment is the social effect with a decrease
in delinquency and in the number of drug-abuse related incarcerations. The
consequences in terms of employment are less clear and vary depending on th
e social setting. The therapeutic window is Very narrow with methadone and
results are highly dependent on practical applications. A multidisciplinary
and individualized approach is required.
Buphrenorphine: There has been less work on buphrenorphine, Like methadone,
there is a dose/efficacy relationship. The results of comparative studies
between the two agents are quite similar with a possible advantage for buph
renorpbine because of the wider prescription spectrum and the possibility o
f longer intervals between administrations.
Extrapolating models: The implications of applying models developed in othe
r countries to the social context in France still have to be analyzed on a
scientific basis. New trial methodologies are needed to evaluate the social
and psychological impact of individualized management.