Wl. Woolverton et K. Alling, Choice under concurrent VI schedules: comparison of behavior maintained bycocaine or food, PSYCHOPHAR, 141(1), 1999, pp. 47-56
Previous research has shown that concurrent schedule responding maintained
by cocaine under short variable-interval (VI) schedules is well described b
y the generalized matching law. That is, drug-maintained behavior was appor
tioned in accordance with relative frequency of reinforcement. The purpose
of the present experiment was to examine the ability of the generalized mat
ching law to account for choice under longer VI schedules of cocaine availa
bility, and to compare cocaine-maintained to food-maintained behavior in th
is regard. One group of rhesus monkeys (n=4) was prepared with indwelling I
V catheters and allowed to respond under concurrent VI (conc VI) schedules
of cocaine delivery (0.025, 0.05 or 0.1 mg/kg per injection) with an averag
e inter-reinforcer interval (IRI) of 10 or 30 min. In a second group of mon
keys (n=4), a comparable experiment was conducted but with responding maint
ained by different amounts of food (one, two, or four 1-g banana-flavored p
ellets). For both groups, the same reinforcer followed responding on either
lever, the only difference between the options being the VI schedule, i.e.
, frequency of reinforcement. The behavior of the cocaine-maintained group
was well predicted by the generalized matching law. While both groups evide
nced undermatching of both response and time allocation, lever pressing of
monkeys whose behavior was maintained by food showed more undermatching tha
n that of the cocaine-maintained group. In addition, a consistent and unexp
lained bias in responding toward the right lever developed in the food-main
tained, but not the cocaine-maintained monkeys. Considering the present res
ults with those of previous experiments, it appears that food-, but not coc
aine-maintained behavior, deviates increasingly from strict matching as the
IRI is extended. This difference across reinforcers could be due to differ
ences between cocaine and food in the mechanisms by which they maintain beh
avior, or a direct effect of cocaine on choice performance.