Conventional and Bayesian approach to climate-change detection and attribution

Authors
Citation
K. Hasselmann, Conventional and Bayesian approach to climate-change detection and attribution, Q J R METEO, 124(552), 1998, pp. 2541-2565
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
ISSN journal
00359009 → ACNP
Volume
124
Issue
552
Year of publication
1998
Part
B
Pages
2541 - 2565
Database
ISI
SICI code
0035-9009(199810)124:552<2541:CABATC>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
The conventional multi-variate, multi-fingerprint theory of climate-change detection and attribution, expressed in terms of existing frequency distrib utions, is reviewed and generalized to a Bayesian approach based on subject ive probabilities. Bayesian statistics enable a quantitative determination of the impact of climate-change detection tests on prior subjective assessm ents of the probability of an externally forced climate change. The Bayesia n method also provides a potentially powerful tool for enhancing statistica l detection and attribution tests by combining a number of different climat e-change indicators that are not amenable to standard signal-to-noise analy ses because of inadequate information on the associated natural-variability statistics. The relation between the conventional and Bayesian approach is illustrated by examples taken from recent conventional analyses of climate -change detection and attribution for three cases of climate-change forcing by increasing greenhouse-gas concentrations, increasing greenhouse-gas and aerosol concentrations, and variations, in solar insolation. The enhanceme nt of detection and attribution levels through a joint Bayesian anal:lsis o f a number of different climate-change indices is demonstrated in a further example. However, this advantage of the Bayesian approach can be achieved only within the framework of a subjective rather than objective analysis. T he conventional and Bayesian approach both exhibit specific advantages and shortcomings, so that a parallel application of both methods is probably th e most promising detection and attribution strategy.