The paper reports on a qualitative analysis of 15 personal interviews with
holocaust survivors in Israel concerning their perceptions of similarities
and differences between socially-assisted dying and the holocaust policies.
The design of the study was exploratory/descriptive and asked the followin
g questions:"Some discussions have expressed similarities between Nazi Germ
any and euthanasia. Do you believe the comparison is justified? In what way
s are euthanasia and the holocaust similar? In what ways are they different
?" Participants concluded that profound differences existed between Nazi Ge
rmany and socially assisted dying. These differences were established from
four different perspectives in 10 different themes, and demonstrated by 24
different examples of the themes. Informants further cautioned philosophers
about comparisons between the holocaust and other human behaviors. The sur
vivors perceived that such a comparison has negative consequences for their
own well-being, the dignity of their family members, the next generation a
nd the Israeli society. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.