Clinical application of the ultrasound velocity dilution method for cardiac output (CO) measurement in the absence of arteriovenous circuit in ICU patients
A. Eremenko et al., Clinical application of the ultrasound velocity dilution method for cardiac output (CO) measurement in the absence of arteriovenous circuit in ICU patients, INT CONGR S, 1168, 1998, pp. 93-96
Background Ultrasound velocity indicator dilution method of cardiac output
(CO) determination has been proposed as an alternative to thermodilution me
thod in the treatment of patients during extracorporeal detoxification proc
edures. Recently, a modification of the method that does not require extrac
orporeal circuit existence has been used in experimental studies and has be
en reported.
The aim. The aim of the study was to evaluate the possibility of the clinic
al application of the ultrasound velocity dilution method in the absence of
the extracorporeal circuit.
Method. The Transonic Systems Inc. flow-dilution sensor was clipped onto a
tube connecting arterial and venous lines routinely used in critically ill
patients. The calibration injection of I mi of 0.9% saline solution (Vcal)
at body temperature was made into the arterial site of the system followed
by the indicator dilution calibration curve registration (Scal). Then a bol
us of 10-20 mi of the same indicator (Vinj) was injected into the central V
ein with the subsequent recording of the first passage curve (Sinj). The ar
eas under the dilution curves with known blood flow and known volumes of in
jection were used for cardiac output calculation according to the following
formula: CO = Q x (Vinj/Vcal) x (Scal/Sinj).
Results. A comparative study of CO determination with thermodilution method
was made in II patients in the early postoperative period after open heart
surgery In 26 measurements, mean values for CO were 5.9 +/- 1.6 For the ul
trasound method and 5.85 +/- 1.7 l/min for the thermodilution method. The d
ifference between the two methods was less than 10% in 5 (19.3%) cases and
less than 16% in 3 (11.5%) cases. The correlation coefficient was 0.97 and
the linear regression equation: COtherm. = -0.1 + 1.01 x COus.
Conclusions. In clinical practice the modification of the ultrasound veloci
ty dilution method, that did not require continuous arteriovenous shunt or
extracorporeal circuit existence, was developed and approved. The method is
reliable, and, in the presence of arterial and venous lines in critically
ill patients, does not require cardiac catherization for CO measurement.