Sonographic evaluation of abdominal and retroperitoneal lymph nodes in healthy subjects.

Citation
Cf. Dietrich et al., Sonographic evaluation of abdominal and retroperitoneal lymph nodes in healthy subjects., ULTRASC MED, 19(6), 1998, pp. 265-269
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN
ISSN journal
01724614 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
265 - 269
Database
ISI
SICI code
0172-4614(199812)19:6<265:SEOAAR>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Purpose: Transabdominal ultrasonography is able to detect normal sized peri hepatic lymph nodes. The role of transabdominal ultrasonography in detectin g normal lymph nodes in other abdominal locations has not yet been examined . Methods: 92 healthy volunteers (57 male, 35 female; age: 33 +/- 9 [19 - 6 6] years) were examined by transabdominal ultrasonography. The peripancreat ic region, the location between the inferior vena cava and aorta, left para aortal region, and the right mesenteric region next to the terminal ileum w ere studied with high resolution ultrasound. All transabdominal ultrasound examinations were performed with a 3.5 and 5 MHz probe using a special magn ification mode without substantial loss of resolution (RES(R)-mode, Acuson) and additionally by colour doppler imaging (Acuson XP). Results: In 80/92 (87%) of the healthy subjects, all regions could be adequately visualized. In 72% of patients with adequate visualization, abdominal lymph nodes were detectable. Abdominal lymph nodes could be sonographically detected peripan creatically in 14/80 (18%), in the location between the inferior vena cava and aorta in 44/80 (55%), in the left paraaortal region in 32/80 (40%), and in the right mesenteric region next to the terminal ileum in 31/80 (39%) o f the healthy subjects. Conclusion: High resolution ultrasonography is able to detect normal lymph nodes in different abdominal locations in 72% of he althy subjects. Sonographic detection of singular normal-sized abdominal ly mph nodes is not indicative of abdominal disease.