The present paper addresses whether topographical jitter or undersampling m
ight limit pattern perception in foveal, peripheral and strabismic amblyopi
c vision. In the first experiment, we measured contrast thresholds for dete
cting and identifying the orientation (up, down, left, right) of E-like pat
terns comprised of Gabor samples. We found that detection and identificatio
n thresholds were both degraded in peripheral and amblyopic vision; however
, the orientation identification/detection threshold ratio was approximatel
y the same in foveal, peripheral and amblyopic vision. This result is somew
hat surprising, because we anticipated that a high degree of uncalibrated t
opographical jitter in peripheral and amblyopic vision would have affected
orientation identification to a greater extent than detection. In the secon
d experiment, we investigated the tolerance of human and model observers to
perturbation of the positions of the samples defining the pattern when its
contrast was suprathreshold, by measuring a 'jitter threshold' (the amount
of jitter required to reduce performance from near perfect to 62.5% correc
t). The results and modeling of our jitter experiments suggest that pattern
identification is highly robust to positional jitter. The positional toler
ance of foveal, peripheral and amblyopic vision is equal to about half the
separation of the features and the close similarity between the three visua
l systems argues against extreme topographical jitter. The effects of jitte
r on human performance are consistent with the predictions of a 'template'
model. In the third experiment we determined what fraction of the 17 Gabor
samples are needed to reliably identify the orientation of the E-patterns b
y measuring a 'sample threshold' (the proportion of samples required for 62
.5% correct performance). In foveal vision, human observers are highly effi
cient requiring only about half the samples for reliable pattern identifica
tion. Relative to an ideal observer model, humans perform this task with 85
% efficiency. In contrast, in both peripheral vision and strabismic amblyop
ia more samples are required. The increased number of features required in
peripheral vision and strabismic amblyopia suggests that in these visual sy
stems, the stimulus is underrepresented at the stage of feature integration
. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.