S. Becker et al., Occlusion contributes to temporal processing differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis in random-dot displays, VISION RES, 39(2), 1999, pp. 331-339
Stereoscopic depth discrimination was investigated in crossed and uncrossed
directions using stimuli defined by binocular disparity differences embedd
ed in dynamic random-dot stereograms. Across three experiments, fixation wa
s directed to a point on the display screen (which placed crossed stimuli i
n front of, and uncrossed stimuli behind, the background dots of the stereo
gram), to a point in front of the display screen (which placed both crossed
and uncrossed stimuli in front of the background dots), and to a point beh
ind the display screen (which placed both crossed and uncrossed stimuli beh
ind the background dots). Results showed that depth discrimination was alwa
ys good when the stimuli appeared in front of the background dots of the st
ereogram, whereas discrimination was always poor when the stimuli appeared
behind the background dots. These results suggest that differences. between
crossed and uncrossed stereopsis as reported in past research arose, in pa
rt, from effects related to occlusion. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All r
ights reserved.