Nucleic acid (NA) amplification techniques are useful to detect viruses in
water and other environmental samples because they are highly sensitive, sp
ecific and can detect fastidious enteric viruses that do not grow well or n
ot at all in cell cultures. However, RT-PCR was found to detect inactivated
viruses. In terms of risks to public health this constitutes a false posit
ive result, as inactivated viruses are no longer infectious. When polioviru
s type 1 and coliphage MS2 were studied for (a) persistence in water and se
wage and (b) inactivation in water by free chlorine, chlorine dioxide and U
V radiation, RT-PCR assays underestimated virus inactivation. The use of mu
ltiple RT-PCR amplification sites, larger RT-PCR genomic targets and immuno
capture RT-PCR sometimes reduced, but did not eliminate, the discrepancy be
tween loss of infectivity and loss of RT-PCR titre. Virus presence based on
RT-PCR detection must be interpreted with caution when predicting human he
alth risks. (C) 1998 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd on behalf of the IAW
Q. All rights reserved.