OBJECTIVES: Randomized trials with low-dose aspirin to prevent preeclampsia
and intrauterine growth restriction have yielded conflicting results. In p
articular, 3 recent large trials were not conclusive. Study designs, howeve
r, varied greatly regarding selection of patients, dose of aspirin, and tim
ing of treatment, all of which can be determinants of the results. Retrospe
ctively analyzing the conditions associated with failure or success of aspi
rin may therefore help to draw up new hypotheses and prepare for more speci
fic randomized trials.
STUDY DESIGN: We studied a historical cohort of 187 pregnant women who were
considered at high risk for preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction,
or both and were therefore treated with low-dose aspirin between 1989 and
1994. Various epidemiologic, clinical, and laboratory data were extracted f
rom the files. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to searc
h for independent parameters associated with the outcome of pregnancy.
RESULTS: Age, parity, weight, height, and race had no influence on the outc
ome. The success rate was higher when treatment was given because of previo
us poor pregnancy outcomes than when it was given for other indications, an
d the patients with successful therapy had started aspirin earlier than had
those with therapy failure (17.7 vs 20.0 weeks' gestation, P = .04). After
multivariate analysis an increase in Ivy bleeding time after 10 days of tr
eatment by >2 minutes was an independent predictor of a better outcome (odd
s ratio 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.51). Borderline statistical si
gnificance was observed for aspirin initiation before 17 weeks' gestation (
odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.18-1.08). Abnormal uterine arter
y Doppler velocimetric scan at 20-24 weeks' gestation (odds ratio 3.31, 95%
confidence interval 1.41-7.7), abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimet
ric scan after 26 weeks' gestation (odds ratio 37.6, 95% confidence interva
l 3.96-357), and use of antihypertensive therapy (odds ratio 6.06, 95% conf
idence interval 2.45-15) were independent predictors of poor outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of aspirin seems optimal when bleeding time increases
greater than or equal to 2 minutes with treatment, indicating a more power
ful antiplatelet effect. This suggests that the dose of aspirin should be a
djusted according to a biologic marker of the antiplatelet effect. A prospe
ctive trial is warranted to test this hypothesis.