BACKGROUND: The appropriateness of laparoscopic colon resection (LCR) as tr
eatment for malignancy has been questioned.
METHODS: From 1992 to 1997, 91 patients were entered into a prospective stu
dy of LCR for cancer. Clinical, pathologic, and economic parameters of LCR
were compared in a cohort of patients matched for age, tumor stage, and typ
e of colectomy who underwent open colon resection (OCR) during the same tim
e period.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 26 months, there were no significant di
fferences in survival rate for patients in the LCR, converted colon resecti
on, and OCR groups. There were no port-site recurrences and the number of l
ymph nodes harvested was similar among the procedures. Hospital stay was si
gnificantly shorter if laparoscopic resection was successful. Total hospita
l costs were similar for LCR and OCR; however, the costs were significantly
higher for converted colon resection.
CONCLUSIONS: LCR is a sound oncologic procedure that can be performed with
costs similar to OCR. Am J Surg. 1998;176:554-558. (C) 1998 by Excerpta Med
ica, Inc.