Rk. Deeik et al., Appropriate timing of elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery following acute myocardial infarction, AM J SURG, 176(6), 1998, pp. 581-584
BACKGROUND: The appropriate timing of elective coronary artery bypass surge
ry (CABG) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains uncertain. It
is hypothesized that a waiting period allows the myocardium to recover pri
or to revascularization, thus decreasing morbidity and mortality. This stud
y was designed to determine if a waiting strategy is justified following AM
I in patients requiring elective CABG.
METHODS: Between 1994 and 1996, 214 patients underwent isolated, nonrepeat,
elective CABG. Three groups were evaluated: group I, control, 155 patients
with no AMI; group II, 39 patients with nontransmural AMI; and Group Ill,
20 patients with transmural AMI. Demographics, intraoperative, and postoper
ative variables were collected and compared among all groups.
RESULTS: Groups were well-matched demographically: group I, patients waited
an average of 2.3 days in hospital prior to operation; group II, an averag
e of 4.2 days; and group III, an average of 5.2 days. Except for the use of
inotropes, group I 34%, group II 39%, and group III 70% (P = 0.007), and t
he intra-aortic balloon pump, group I 0%, group II 8%, and group III 25% (P
= 0.001). There were no differences in complications. Importantly, there w
as no difference in mortality or postoperative length of stay. The mortalit
y in group I was 2.6%, in group II 2.6%, and in group III 0%. The length of
stay in groups I and II was 8.5 days, and in group III, 8.1 days.
CONCLUSION: A waiting period of 3 to 5 days after a nontransmural AMI and 5
to 7 days after a transmural AMI can produce similar postoperative results
to non-AMI patients undergoing CABG. Thus, a waiting strategy to allow the
myocardium to recover is justified. Am J Surg. 1998;176:581-585. (C) 1998
by Excerpta Medica, Inc.