Appropriate timing of elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery following acute myocardial infarction

Citation
Rk. Deeik et al., Appropriate timing of elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery following acute myocardial infarction, AM J SURG, 176(6), 1998, pp. 581-584
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00029610 → ACNP
Volume
176
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
581 - 584
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9610(199812)176:6<581:ATOECA>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The appropriate timing of elective coronary artery bypass surge ry (CABG) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains uncertain. It is hypothesized that a waiting period allows the myocardium to recover pri or to revascularization, thus decreasing morbidity and mortality. This stud y was designed to determine if a waiting strategy is justified following AM I in patients requiring elective CABG. METHODS: Between 1994 and 1996, 214 patients underwent isolated, nonrepeat, elective CABG. Three groups were evaluated: group I, control, 155 patients with no AMI; group II, 39 patients with nontransmural AMI; and Group Ill, 20 patients with transmural AMI. Demographics, intraoperative, and postoper ative variables were collected and compared among all groups. RESULTS: Groups were well-matched demographically: group I, patients waited an average of 2.3 days in hospital prior to operation; group II, an averag e of 4.2 days; and group III, an average of 5.2 days. Except for the use of inotropes, group I 34%, group II 39%, and group III 70% (P = 0.007), and t he intra-aortic balloon pump, group I 0%, group II 8%, and group III 25% (P = 0.001). There were no differences in complications. Importantly, there w as no difference in mortality or postoperative length of stay. The mortalit y in group I was 2.6%, in group II 2.6%, and in group III 0%. The length of stay in groups I and II was 8.5 days, and in group III, 8.1 days. CONCLUSION: A waiting period of 3 to 5 days after a nontransmural AMI and 5 to 7 days after a transmural AMI can produce similar postoperative results to non-AMI patients undergoing CABG. Thus, a waiting strategy to allow the myocardium to recover is justified. Am J Surg. 1998;176:581-585. (C) 1998 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.