Construction and evaluation of ion selective electrodes for perchlorate with a summing operational amplifier: application to pyrotechnics mixtures analysis

Citation
R. Perez-olmos et al., Construction and evaluation of ion selective electrodes for perchlorate with a summing operational amplifier: application to pyrotechnics mixtures analysis, ANALYST, 124(1), 1999, pp. 97-100
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry & Analysis","Spectroscopy /Instrumentation/Analytical Sciences
Journal title
ANALYST
ISSN journal
00032654 → ACNP
Volume
124
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
97 - 100
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-2654(199901)124:1<97:CAEOIS>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
The construction and evaluation of an electrode selective to perchlorate wi th improved sensitivity, constructed like a conventional electrode (ISE), b ut using an operational amplifier to sum the potentials supplied by four me mbranes (ESOA) is described. The two types of electrodes, without an inner reference solution, were constructed using octylammonium chloride as sensor , a mixture of dibutylphthalate and o-nitrophenyloctyl ether as solvent med iator and PVC as plastic matrix, the membranes being obtained by direct app lication onto a conductive epoxy resin support. After the comparative evalu ation of their working characteristics they were used in the determination of perchlorate in propellants, fulminating powders and fireworks. On all oc casions, the results obtained by the ESOA were found to be similar to those obtained by the conventional ISE, but with higher precision. The limit of detection of the direct potentiometric method developed was found to be 0.1 g kg(-1), and the precision and accuracy of the method, when applied to ei ght different samples of pyrotechnic mixtures, expressed in terms of mean r elative standard deviation and average percentage of spike recovery were 0. 4% and 100.5%, respectively. Adequate agreement was found between the resul ts obtained by the potentiometric method and the reference methods, since t he calculated relative errors ranged from +0.4% to -0.5%.