Rl. Wiener et al., Research report a preliminary analysis of medical futility decisionmaking:Law and professional attitudes, BEH SCI LAW, 16(4), 1998, pp. 497-508
Judicial decisions reviewed in this article indicate that courts have taken
two disparate approaches to disputes over futility of treatment. To explor
e whether a consensus on medical futility is developing among hospitals, th
e authors conducted a nationwide survey of health care professionals at hos
pitals. Respondents assigned importance ratings to factors used in recent f
utility decisions made at their institutions. The resulting importance rati
ngs showed significant variation by characteristics of the institution (com
paring respondents from for-profit, not-for-profit, and government hospital
s) and by profession of the respondent (comparing physicians and nurses). T
he respondents' judgments endorsed three distinct strategies for making fut
ility decisions (i.e., emphasis on the patient's decision preferences, prov
iding for the patient and family, and adhering to objective medical and soc
ial norms). (C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.