This paper acknowledges the importance of the issues that Sullivan (1998) r
aises, but questions assumptions made about the nature of anti-discriminato
ry practice and is critical of the way in which shifts in attitudes are int
erpreted as evidence of further problematic discrimination. It suggests alt
ernative interpretations for Sullivan's examples, and questions the concept
ions of attitudes and the model of self presented in Sullivan's account of
attitude change. The paper considers stereotyping as a cognitive process an
d whether it is an inevitable, or invariable, phenomenon. It reviews the na
ture and goals of anti-discriminatory education, contending that discrimina
tion arises not from the holding of strong attitudes per se, but from the n
ature of, and the consequences that follow from, particular attitudes. Fina
lly, it makes recommendations for educators and provides suggestions for fu
rther development of the anti- discriminatory perspective.