The growth-promoting effects of a bacterial endophyte on lodgepole pine are partially inhibited by the presence of other rhizobacteria

Citation
E. Bent et Cp. Chanway, The growth-promoting effects of a bacterial endophyte on lodgepole pine are partially inhibited by the presence of other rhizobacteria, CAN J MICRO, 44(10), 1998, pp. 980-988
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Biotecnology & Applied Microbiology",Microbiology
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00084166 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
10
Year of publication
1998
Pages
980 - 988
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-4166(199810)44:10<980:TGEOAB>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
To test the hypothesis that rhizobacteria naturally present in soils may in terfere with the extent of root colonization and plant growth promotion by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), we studied two lodgepole pine PGPR (Bacillus polymyxa strains L6 and Pw-2) when inoculated singly and whe n coinoculated with a non-PGPR competitor (Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens PF 322). Bacillus polymyxa Pw-2 and Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens PF322 were c onsistently found as endophytes, while Bacillus polymyxa L6 was never found within the root interior. Strains Pw-2 and L6 differed in the rate and typ e of growth promotion. Strain Pw-2 increased root growth (branching and elo ngation) and shoot biomass accumulation 6 and 9 weeks, respectively after i noculation, while strain L6 increased primary root elongation and root biom ass accumulation after 12 weeks. Seedlings coinoculated with Pw-2 and PF322 had decreased shoot biomass and primary root lengths when compared with se edlings inoculated only with Pw-2. This effect was not linked to a decrease in the population size of Pw-2 in the rhizosphere or in the root interior of coinoculated treatments. Ln contrast, strain L6-mediated growth promotio n was not impaired by coinoculation with PF322. Strain L6 did interfere to some degree with the growth-promoting capability of strain Pw-2. These resu lts indicate that endophytic PGPR may be less adapted to microbial competit ion than external root-colonizing PGPR, and that the efficacy of endophytic PGPR may be reduced by the presence of other bacteria on external or inter nal root tissues.