Hm. Davey et al., Variable selection and multivariate methods for the identification of microorganisms by flow cytometry, CYTOMETRY, 35(2), 1999, pp. 162-168
Background: When exploited fully, flow cytometry can be used to provide mul
tiparametric data for each cell in the sample of interest. While this makes
flow cytometry a powerful technique for discriminating between different c
ell types, the data can be difficult to interpret. Traditionally, dual-para
meter plots are used to visualize now cytometric data, and for a data set c
onsisting of seven parameters, one should examine 21 of these plots. A more
efficient method is to reduce the dimensionality of the data (e.g., using
unsupervised methods such as principal components analysis) so that fewer g
raphs need to be examined, or to use supervised multivariate data analysis
methods to give a prediction of the identity of the analyzed particles.
Materials and Methods: We collected multiparametric data sets for microbiol
ogical samples stained with six cocktails of fluorescent stains. Multivaria
te data analysis methods were explored as a means of microbial detection an
d identification.
Results: We show that while all cocktails and all methods gave good accurac
y of predictions (>94%), careful selection of both the stains and the analy
sis method could improve this figure (to >99% accuracy), even in a data set
that was not used in the formation of the supervised multivariate calibrat
ion model.
Conclusions: Flow cytometry provides a rapid method of obtaining multiparam
etric data for distinguishing between microorganisms. Multivariate data ana
lysis methods have an important role to play in extracting the information
from the data obtained. Artificial neural networks proved to be the most su
itable method of data analysis. (C) 1999 Wiley Liss, Inc.