Given that body mass evolves non-randomly in birds, it is important to ask
what factors might be responsible. One suggestion is that the rate at which
individuals turn resources into offspring, termed 'reproductive power', mi
ght explain this non-randomness. This is because, in mammals, the body mass
with the highest reproductive power is the most common (modal) one. Reprod
uctive power was estimated for birds from data on energetic content of eggs
and population productivity. According to the formulation of Brown et al.
(1993), reproductive power is composed of two component processes: acquisit
ion (acquiring resources and storing them in reproductive biomass) and conv
ersion (converting reproductive biomass into offspring). As with mammals, e
stimates of reproductive power indicate that the most common body mass in b
irds is also the body mass that maximizes reproductive power. The relations
hip between reproductive power and diversity is different for species small
er than this modal body mass when compared to those that are larger. The re
lationship of body mass and reproductive power is different between birds a
nd mammals in two ways: (1) the body mass that maximizes reproductive power
is smaller in birds (33 g) than in mammals (100 g), and (2) mammals genera
te more reproductive power than an equivalent-sized bird. Reproductive powe
r is determined primarily by acquisition in small birds and mammals, while
it is determined by conversion in the largest birds and mammals. It is like
ly that reproductive power is closely tied to the evolution and diversifica
tion of body masses because it constrains the ways in which traits affectin
g fitness can evolve.