J. Hara et al., Approximating dipoles from human EEG activity: The effect of dipole sourceconfiguration on dipolarity using single dipole models, IEEE BIOMED, 46(2), 1999, pp. 125-129
Dipolarity is the goodness-of-fit of the observed potential distribution wi
th one calculated using specific assumptions about the source of the electr
ical potential distribution. We used computer simulations to examine the ef
fect of different distributions of sources on their resulting dipolarity va
lues, Electric dipoles were placed in a head-shaped model with uniform cond
uctivity using four different dipole configurations (randomly oriented dipo
les, a uniform dipole disk layer, a dipole disk layer with uniformly distri
buted holes, or one with randomly oriented dipoles), The best-fitting singl
e dipole for each configuration was calculated and the dipolarity was compu
ted as the mean squared error of the electrical potential distributions gen
erated by the actual dipole configuration and by the best-fitting single di
pole, The simulations show that: 1) a smooth dipole layer with or without h
oles gives dipolarities above 99.5% even when extended over areas as large
as 1256 mm(2); 2) randomly oriented dipoles under a smooth dipole layer als
o give dipolarities above 99.5%; and 3) randomly oriented and distributed d
ipoles, even if contained in a small portion of the total area, give dipola
rities below 93.0%. These simulations show that inhomogeneity (holes) withi
n a dipole disk layer per se do not lower dipolarity; rather, it is the ran
dom orientation and distribution of these dipoles which lowers dipolarity,
Furthermore, dipolarity is not lowered by such randomly oriented and distri
buted dipoles when they are beneath a dipole disk layer.