Clinical relevance of a European collaborative study on comparative susceptibility of Gram-positive clinical isolates to teicoplanin and vancomycin

Citation
Rn. Gruneberg et W. Hryniewicz, Clinical relevance of a European collaborative study on comparative susceptibility of Gram-positive clinical isolates to teicoplanin and vancomycin, INT J ANT A, 10(4), 1998, pp. 271-277
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS
ISSN journal
09248579 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
271 - 277
Database
ISI
SICI code
0924-8579(199811)10:4<271:CROAEC>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Seventy laboratories in nine European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland and the UK) each colle cted 100 consecutive Gram-positive bacterial pathogens during 1995. MICs we re determined by a co-ordinating laboratory in each country using an agar i ncorporation method with Mueller Hinton medium (NCCLS). Quality control was ensured by distribution of five test strains to the co-ordinating laborato ries. A total of 7078 isolates was collected: 2885 Staphylococcus aureus, 1 706 enterococci, 1480 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 932 Streptoco ccus spp. (including 289 strains of S. pneumoniae) and 75 miscellaneous spe cies. Of these, the country coordinators successfully re-tested 6824 isolat es. Using NCCLS interpretive criteria, overall 39 isolates (including 28 st rains of enterococci) were teicoplanin-resistant (0.57%) and 38 (mostly CNS ; 0.56%) were intermediate, whilst 32 isolates (including 30 strains of ent erococci) were resistant to vancomycin (0.47%) and 7 (all enterococci; 0.10 %) were intermediate. The overall resistance rate was less than or equal to 0.5%. The two glycopeptides were essentially active against the major path ogens encountered in the survey. The only real difference with clinical imp lications from previously reported susceptibility data is the emergence and spread of resistance in enterococci, particularly in E. faecium. Resistanc e was highest in SSTI, UTI, bloodstream and GI infections; no resistance wa s encountered in RTI, gynaecological infections or central nervous system i nfections. This resistance was also geographically diverse: Resistance to v ancomycin in E. faecalis was present only in France, Germany, Italy, Portug al and Spain (Italy and Spain only for teicoplanin), whilst resistance to t eicoplanin and vancomycin in E. faecium was present in all countries except Spain. Eight isolates (0.5% of all enterococci) were vancomycin-resistant but teicoplanin-susceptible, exhibiting the vanB phenotype. These were four strains of E. faecalis and four strains of E. faecium. Whilst isolates of S. haemolyticus had higher MIC of teicoplanin than other CNS, and were more susceptible to vancomycin, overall resistance to teicoplanin was low (3.3% in S. haemolyticus; 0.6% in CNS). S. haemolyticus was a relatively rare pa thogen, accounting for 6.3% of all CNS isolates, and 1.4% of all Gram-posit ives collected. The results of this survey show that, despite occasional no socomial problems (e.g. with enterococci and S. haemolyticus), teicoplanin or vancomycin remain adequate therapy for infections caused by Gram-positiv e pathogens in the 1990s. (C) 1998 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. and I nternational Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.