Gl. Gibby, ANESTHESIA INFORMATION-MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS - THEIR ROLE IN RISK-VERSUS-COST ASSESSMENT AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 11(2), 1997, pp. 2-5
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology,"Peripheal Vascular Diseas","Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Computerized clinical information systems clearly have a role in this
era of managed care when outcomes research and cost/benefit analyses a
re becoming crucial. Despite anesthesiologists' leadership in developi
ng physician-entry systems, automated recordkeeping systems have been
underused. This report reviews the problems and possible solutions ass
ociated with establishing more effective and user-friendly systems in
the anesthesia specialty. A key feature of any cost/benefit analysis o
r outcome study is the precise definition of data to be collected. Red
esign of anesthesia information systems will be required to assist use
rs to enter events according to standardized definitions. To filter th
e vast amount of data collected by electronic medical-records systems
in the ordinary course of care that are not applicable to a specific s
tudy, some form of filtering or data reduction on transfer to research
or administrative databases will be needed, To allow careful analysis
of possible correlations of outcome to care choices requires both the
capture of the clinical context-a detailed description of all relevan
t conditions extending well beyond merely the objective vital signs-th
roughout a specific medical episode and the establishment of postopera
tive evaluation systems to allow outcomes capture, Connections to new
as well as existing outcome data will provide vast new opportunities f
or outcomes research. Copyright (C) 1997 by W.B. Saunders Company.