Flight behaviour of nocturnally migrating birds in coastal areas - crossing or coasting

Citation
B. Bruderer et F. Liechti, Flight behaviour of nocturnally migrating birds in coastal areas - crossing or coasting, J AVIAN BIO, 29(4), 1998, pp. 499-507
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
09088857 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
499 - 507
Database
ISI
SICI code
0908-8857(199812)29:4<499:FBONMB>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Numerous reports on homogeneous streams of nocturnal migrants over land and water, crossing coastlines without taking any notice of the habitat change underneath, seem to contradict recent infrared observations along the Fren ch and Spanish Mediterranean coasts in autumn, suggesting important deviati ons from the standard SSW or SW flow of migrants associated with the geogra phical situation and the course of the coastlines. In order to look for potential reactions of nocturnal migrants to the sea/l and transition, the flight paths of night-migrating birds were recorded by tracking radar in autumn 1996 at the southern tip of Mallorca and at the E- W leading coast near Malaga. Within the tracking time of 40 per individual there was no short-term adjustment of direction when crossing the coastline , neither were there differences in the average vertical speeds of birds ap proaching and leaving the coast. The mean altitudes of tracked birds, howev er, were about 9%, higher above land than over water at both sites. Between -site comparison revealed higher average Right speeds of birds above the is land than when leaving the mainland. At both sites important variation in f light behaviour was observed in the course of the night: near Malaga a cont inuous shift towards the E-W leading coast, simultaneously over water and l and, suggests diminishing motivation to continue flights across the sea at times when decreasing fat reserves and/or an endogenous rhythm dissuade fro m crossing an obstacle of unknown dimensions. Increasing proportions of rev erse migration in the course of the night at both sites, with birds flying at low levels and low speeds, are additional indications of motivational co nflicts between continuing migration and landing. Optimal migratory behavio ur therefore does not necessarily imply that birds should follow the shorte st route, but appears to be an adjustable compromise between risk avoidance and straight flight depending on endogenous and environmental conditions.