Because of the potential for confounding by indication (disease severity) i
n individual-level observational studies of intended treatment effects, a t
reatment designed to prevent an adverse event may appear to cause it. We us
e a hypothetical example to show that despite substantial variation in the
frequency of treatment among patients residing in different geographic area
s, a constant area-specific mortality rate can be observed, indicating the
absence of confounding by indication at the ecologic level. The advantage o
f ecologic over individual-level observational studies in the assessment of
intended treatment effects holds even if variations in disease severity, s
ocioeconomic status, and other unmeasured factors are taken into account, a
s long as treatment utilization is influenced by practice style in the loca
l medical community independently of disease severity. Ecologic studies can
suggest the need for changes in practice, help resolve ethical issues, and
indicate priorities for randomized trials. J CLIN EPIDEMIOL 52;1;7-12, 199
9. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.