In this paper, comparison is made of terms describing solubilization of hyd
rophobic organic compounds (HOC) by dissolved humic substances (DHS) and co
mmercial non-ionic surfactants. This paper examines the ability of a commer
cial humic acid (Aldrich humic acid) to solubilize and mobilize tetrachloro
thene (PCE) residual in porous media. The constant for solubilization of PC
E by Aldrich humic acid is shown to be a factor of two to thirty times less
than that published for dodecyl alcohol ethoxylate surfactants, showing th
at Aldrich humic acid is less capable than some non-ionic surfactants at so
lubilizing residual PCE. The depression of PCE-water interfacial tension in
the presence of DHS is shown to be significantly less than published value
s for a non-ionic surfactant, and surfactant mixtures, indicating that the
DHS used in this study is less prone to cause mobilization of non-aqueous p
hase liquids relative to surfactants. Several possible advantages of DHS us
e in the remediation of subsurface media contaminated with HOC are describe
d, including the ability of DHS to solubilize HOC irrespective of the DHS c
oncentration, and potential lesser tendency of DHS to depress the interfaci
al tension between non-aqueous phases and water relative to surfactants (an
advantage when mobilization is undesired). (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.
All rights reserved.