Objectives: Exposure of restorations in extracted teeth to cyclic thermal f
luctuations to simulate one of the many factors in the oral environment has
been common in many tracer penetration, marginal gap and bond strength lab
oratory tests. Temperature changes used have rarely been substantiated with
temperature measurements made in vivo and vary considerably between report
s. Justification and standardization of regimen are required.
Data, sources and study selection: An assessment of reports describing temp
erature changes of teeth in vivo is followed by an analysis of 130 studies
of laboratory thermal cycling of teeth by 99 first authors selected from 25
journals. A clinically relevant thermal cycling regimen was derived from t
he in vivo information, and is suggested as a benchmark standard.
Conclusions: Variation of regimens used was large, making comparison of rep
orts difficult. Reports of testing the effects of thermal cycling were ofte
n contradictory, but generally leakage increased with thermal stress, altho
ugh it has never been demonstrated that cyclic testing is relevant to clini
cal failures. However, should this be done, the standard cyclic regimen def
ined is: 35 degrees C (28 s), 15 degrees C (2 s), 35 degrees C (28 s), 45 d
egrees C (2 s). No evidence of the number of cycles likely to be experience
d in vivo was found and this requires investigation, but a provisional esti
mate of approximately 10 000 cycles per year is suggested. Thermal stressin
g of restoration interfaces is only of value when the initial bond is alrea
dy known to be reliable. This is not the case for most current restorative
materials. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.