There are few reports that compare losses of atrazine 16-chloro-N-ethyl-N'-
(1-methyethyl)-1,3,5-triazine from band and broadcast applications. A field
study was conducted in Connecticut to determine the leaching losses of atr
azine when applied to maize (Zea mays L.) in 15-cm bands over the rows or b
roadcast onto the entire plot. Estimates of leaching losses were made with
zero-tension pan lysimeters. The experiment was set out as a randomized com
plete block design with four replicates and treatments were method of appli
cation (broadcast vs. band) and location of lysimeters (row vs. interrow),
Water samples were analyzed for atrazine and related s-triazines using enzy
me-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), There was a greater (P < 0.01) frequ
ency of water samples with atrazine detections from the broadcast applicati
on (>99%) than from the band application (82%), Atrazine concentrations als
o were more likely (P < 0.01) to be above the maximum contaminant level (MC
L) of 3 mu g L-1 from broadcast treatments (7.1%) than from band treatments
(0.7%), Concentrations and mass loss of atrazine were three to four times
greater (P < 0.05) in the broadcast treatment than in the band treatment. T
here were significant (P < 0.05) differences in concentrations and mass los
ses of atrazine between row and interrow locations of lysimeters for band a
pplication but not for broadcast application. Maize yield was not reduced b
y band atrazine application with interrow cultivation. There is less potent
ial of groundwater contamination from atrazine when applied in a band than
when applied broadcast.