Efficacy of an assessment instrument to measure affective and cognitive learning domains of students enrolled in food or nutrition courses

The purpose of the project was to evaluate the feasibility of using a publi c domain instrument, the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (M SLQ), to assess affective and cognitive learning domains among volunteer st udents (n = 44) enrolled in food and nutrition courses. Using SAS and alpha 0.01, significant Pearson's Product Moment Correlation Coefficients were c alculated between the MSLQ scale, intrinsic motivation, and the following M SLQ scales: task value (r = 0.55), metacognition (r = 0.5) and time managem ent (r = 0.54). Correlations between task value and metacognition, students ' effort, rehearsal or elaboration learning strategies were r = 0.48, 0.51, 0.55 and 0.58, respectively. Correlations between students' effort and tim e management, metacognition and sense of self-efficacy were r = 0.71, 0.73 and 0.48, respectively. Significant inverse correlations were identified be tween students' fear of tests and their sense of self-efficacy (r = -0.50) or the effort expended to master learning (r = -0.40). Multiple regression analysis revealed that a three predictor variable model including metacogni tion, peer help and seeking help from the instructor explained 51.6% of the variance in scores of the first course exam (F = 14.22, F = 0.0001). Educa tors need to consider how cognitive and affective differences in learning p rocesses influence curricular and instructional decisions in human-nutritio n and dietetics.