When union-firm pairs bargain sequentially, and when unobserved components
of firms' abilities to pay are subject to correlated shocks, unions that ba
rgain later in a sequence can acquire valuable information by observing pre
vious bargaining outcomes in their industry. We derive the implications of
this kind of learning in an asymmetric information model of wage negotiatio
ns and argue that the most robust implication is a lower incidence of strik
es among "followers" than "leaders" in wage negotiations. Considerable empi
rical support for this implication is found in a long panel of Canadian con
tract negotiations.