Restrictor plugging in off-line supercritical fluid extraction of environmental samples - Microscopic, chemical, and spectroscopic evaluations

Citation
Sh. Page et al., Restrictor plugging in off-line supercritical fluid extraction of environmental samples - Microscopic, chemical, and spectroscopic evaluations, J SUPERCR F, 14(3), 1999, pp. 257-270
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Physical Chemistry/Chemical Physics","Chemical Engineering
Journal title
JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
ISSN journal
08968446 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
257 - 270
Database
ISI
SICI code
0896-8446(19990301)14:3<257:RPIOSF>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Irreversible restrictor plugging is often a problem in supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) with linear restrictors. Restrictor plugging occurs when h igh temperature (200 degrees C) off-line SFE is performed on either the mar ine sediment (SRM 1941) or the urban dust (SRM 1649) standard reference mat erial (SRM). Microscopic evaluation of the linear restrictors (50 mu m i.d. x 40 cm long fused silica capillary) showed that a solid mass approximatel y 1 cm to 3 cm from the tip of the restrictor caused the plugging in the ca se of SRM 1941. Three distinct zones of analyte deposition were observed in the restrictor used during SFE of SRM 1649 - a thin, diffuse, granular him (3 cm to 13 cm from tip), a thick, wavy film (13 cm to 17 cm from tip), an d plugs of highly viscous liquid (17 cm to 28 cm from tip). Raman microscop y and X-ray microanalysis confirmed that inorganic sulfur was the major com ponent of the material plugging the restrictor when SRM 1941 was extracted. X-ray microanalysis and direct insertion probe mass spectrometry confirmed that dichlorophen, phthalate esters, hydrocarbon fragments, and other comp ounds were contained in the material plugging the restrictor when SRM 1649 was extracted. In both cases the plugging did not occur at the tip of the r estrictor. Both isenthalpic and isentropic explanations for plugging in SRM 1649 and 1941 are invalid because the zones of plugging are significantly removed from the tip of the restrictor and decompression occurred over a la rge region of the restrictor. The analytes appeared to have condensed in th e linear restrictor either immediately after exiting the oven (SRM 1649) or further down the restrictor (SRM 1941). (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.