Rg. Macgregor et Nh. Casey, Evaluation of carving interval and calving date as measures of reproductive performance in a beef herd, LIVEST PROD, 57(2), 1999, pp. 181-191
Calving interval is currently used as the measure of reproductive performan
ce in South Africa and many other countries, but some authors have claimed
that calving interval is not a suitable measure of reproductive performance
, when cows are mated during a restricted breeding season. Numerous authors
have suggested that calving date is a suitable alternative measure of repr
oductive performance. This study was undertaken to investigate the factors
influencing calving interval and calving date, in order to determine their
suitability as measures of reproductive performance under conditions of res
tricted breeding. Two models were developed, each having the following inde
pendent effects: Year of birth, age of dam, previous sex of calf, previous
calf birth weight, previous calf weaning weight and previous calving date.
A number of interactions were included. In Model 2, gestation length was in
cluded as an additional independent effect. The dependent variables were: c
alving interval and calving date. Year of birth and previous calving date h
ad a highly significant influence on calving interval and calving date whil
st age of dam had a highly significant influence on calving interval and a
significant influence on calving date. A 1 day delay in previous calving da
te, resulted in a 0.72 day decrease in calving interval, and a 0.27 day inc
rease in calving date (Model 1). In Model 1, previous calving date was the
variable having the greatest influence on calving interval and calving date
with previous calving date having a much greater influence on calving inte
rval than on calving date, as determined by the significantly larger mean s
quare associated with calving interval than calving date. When calving inte
rval was corrected for the large negative effect of previous calving date,
calving interval and calving date became similar measures. It was concluded
that calving interval was a more biased method of evaluating reproductive
performance than calving date, when cows are mated during a restricted bree
ding season, due to the negative relationship between previous calving date
and calving interval and that calving date could be a suitable alternative
measure of reproductive performance. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All ri
ghts reserved.