Evaluation of carving interval and calving date as measures of reproductive performance in a beef herd

Citation
Rg. Macgregor et Nh. Casey, Evaluation of carving interval and calving date as measures of reproductive performance in a beef herd, LIVEST PROD, 57(2), 1999, pp. 181-191
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE
ISSN journal
03016226 → ACNP
Volume
57
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
181 - 191
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-6226(199901)57:2<181:EOCIAC>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Calving interval is currently used as the measure of reproductive performan ce in South Africa and many other countries, but some authors have claimed that calving interval is not a suitable measure of reproductive performance , when cows are mated during a restricted breeding season. Numerous authors have suggested that calving date is a suitable alternative measure of repr oductive performance. This study was undertaken to investigate the factors influencing calving interval and calving date, in order to determine their suitability as measures of reproductive performance under conditions of res tricted breeding. Two models were developed, each having the following inde pendent effects: Year of birth, age of dam, previous sex of calf, previous calf birth weight, previous calf weaning weight and previous calving date. A number of interactions were included. In Model 2, gestation length was in cluded as an additional independent effect. The dependent variables were: c alving interval and calving date. Year of birth and previous calving date h ad a highly significant influence on calving interval and calving date whil st age of dam had a highly significant influence on calving interval and a significant influence on calving date. A 1 day delay in previous calving da te, resulted in a 0.72 day decrease in calving interval, and a 0.27 day inc rease in calving date (Model 1). In Model 1, previous calving date was the variable having the greatest influence on calving interval and calving date with previous calving date having a much greater influence on calving inte rval than on calving date, as determined by the significantly larger mean s quare associated with calving interval than calving date. When calving inte rval was corrected for the large negative effect of previous calving date, calving interval and calving date became similar measures. It was concluded that calving interval was a more biased method of evaluating reproductive performance than calving date, when cows are mated during a restricted bree ding season, due to the negative relationship between previous calving date and calving interval and that calving date could be a suitable alternative measure of reproductive performance. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All ri ghts reserved.