Psychometric properties of the functional performance inventory in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Authors
Citation
Nk. Leidy, Psychometric properties of the functional performance inventory in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, NURS RES, 48(1), 1999, pp. 20-28
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
NURSING RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00296562 → ACNP
Volume
48
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
20 - 28
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-6562(199901/02)48:1<20:PPOTFP>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Background: The Functional Performance Inventory (FPI) is a subjective meas ure of the performance dimension of functional status, based on an explicit analytical framework and the experiences of patients themselves. Objectives: To describe the conceptual foundation of the instrument, the pr ocedures used to maximize content validity, and the results of the initial psychometric testing of the FPI in patients with chronic obstructive pulmon ary disease (COPD). Method: Items and response structure for the instrument were drawn from the literature and qualitative interviews with 12 men and women with COPD. Twe nty-four clinical and scientific experts participated in content validation . To assess the FPI's psychometric characteristics, 154 patients participat ed in a cross-sectional mail survey; 54 took part in a 2-week reproducibili ty assessment. Forty relatives were also included in validity testing. Results: The instrument was internally consistent (alpha = .96) and reprodu cible (ICC = .85). Validity was evident in the significant (p < .001) corre lations found between the FPI total score and the Functional Status Questio nnaire (activities of daily living, r= .68; instrumental activities of dail y living, r= .68), Duke Activity Status Index (r= .61), Bronchitis-Emphysem a Symptom Checklist (r = -.59), Basic Need Satisfaction Inventory (r = .61) , and Cantril's Ladder of Life Satisfaction (r = .63). The relationship bet ween patient FPI score and relative perception of functioning, using the Ka tz Adjustment Scale for Relatives, was also significant (socially expected activities, r = .53; free-time activities, r = .49, p < .01). The instrumen t discriminated between patients with severe and moderate levels of perceiv ed severity and activity limitation (t = 8.52, p <.001) and patients with F EV, greater than and less than 1.0 liter (t = 4.25, p < .001). Conclusions: Results suggest that the FPI is a useful measure of functional performance in patients with COPD. Further development of the spiritual ac tivities and work and school domains is in order, as is additional study of the instrument's responsiveness to change.