Many theories of the effects of attitudes on memory for attitude-relevant i
nformation would predict that: attitudinally congenial information should b
e more memorable than uncongenial information. Yet, this meta-analysis show
ed that this congeniality effect is inconsistent across the experiments in
this research literature and small when these effects are aggregated. The t
endency of the congeniality effect to decrease over the years spanned by th
is literature appeared to reflect the weaker methods used in the earlier st
udies. The effect was stronger in 2 kinds of earlier experiments that may b
e tinged with artifact: those in which the coding of recall measures was no
t known to be blind and those that used recognition measures that were not
corrected for bias. Nonetheless, several additional characteristics of the
studies moderated the congeniality effect and suggested that both attitude
structure and motivation to process attitude-relevant information are relev
ant to understanding the conditions under which people have superior memory
for attitudinally congenial or uncongenial information.