M. Younes et al., STRATIFIED MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF PROGNOSTIC MARKERS IN BREAST-CANCER - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT, Anticancer research, 17(2B), 1997, pp. 1383-1390
Published results using prognostic markers in breast cancer have been
very confusing to oncologists, surgeons, and pathologists alike As a r
esult, there is a wide variation in opinion among oncologists about th
e utility of these markers in clinical practice. This study was undert
aken to determine the utility of stratified multivariate survival anal
ysis in integrating the commonly used prognostic factors into a user-f
riendly prognostic scheme, and its implication for treatment decision
making. 300 women with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast who wer
e followed-up for 28-112 months (median 72 months) were entered in the
study. Patients with distant metastases, those with bilateral or mult
ifocal tumors, and special types of carcinoma were excluded. Variables
included in the stratified multivariate survival analysis were estrog
en receptor (ER) status, tumor size, nodal status, histological grade,
number of mitotic figures per ten high power fields (MF/10HPF), and t
ype of initial therapy. Data was subjected to Kaplan-Meier survival an
alysis and the log rank test for statistical significance at different
steps of the analysis Cut-off values for ER that produced a significa
nt difference in survival varied from 9 fmol/mg protein to as high as
76 fmol/mg protein in different patient groups and MF/10HPF varied fro
m 6 to 21. Patients were stratified into different groups that enabled
better evaluation of treatment outcome. Patients could also be combin
ed into three groups with significantly different survival rates (p<0.
0001). Stratified multivariate survival analysis show that prognostic
markers a) are interdependent and their cut-off values vary depending
on other tumor characteristics, and b) if used in a systematic way, th
ey can be used to guide treatment decisions.