Increasingly, scientists are being called upon to assist in the development
of indicators for monitoring ecosystem health. For human health indicators
, they may draw on environmental exposure, human morbidity/mortality or wel
l-being and sustainability approaches. To improve the rigour of indicators,
we propose six scientific criteria for indicator selection: (1) data avail
ability, suitability and representativeness (of populations), (2) indicator
validity (face, construct, predictive and convergent) and reliability; (3)
indicator responsiveness to change; (4) indicator desegregation capability
(across personal and community characteristics); (5) indicator comparabili
ty (across populations and jurisdictions); and (6) indicator representative
ness (across important dimensions of concern). We comment on our current ca
pacity to adhere to such criteria with examples of measures of environmenta
l exposure, human health and sustainability. We recognize the considerable
work still required on documenting environment-human health relationships a
nd on monitoring potential indicators in similar ways over time. Yet we arg
ue that such work is essential in order for science to inform policy decisi
ons which affect the health of ecosystems and human health. (C) 1998 Elsevi
er Science B.V. All rights reserved.