Piglet euthanasia: gas or injection?

Citation
V. Baumans et al., Piglet euthanasia: gas or injection?, TIJD DIERG, 123(24), 1998, pp. 738-742
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR DIERGENEESKUNDE
ISSN journal
00407453 → ACNP
Volume
123
Issue
24
Year of publication
1998
Pages
738 - 742
Database
ISI
SICI code
0040-7453(199812)123:24<738:PEGOI>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Methods for the humane killing of animals are watched critically by both th e public and the veterinary community. Evaluation of such methods requires assessment of efficacy as well as emotional and ethical aspects. Rapidly of loss of consciousness is a crucial factor in such evaluations. In the pres ent study, four methods for piglet euthanasia were compared with regard to presence of indicators of discomfort (pain, anxiety, stress) and rapidity o f onset or death, defined as the absence of breathing, heart beats and refl exes, combined with isoelectricity of the electro-encephalogram (EEG). The study was performed on piglets, which hud to be destroyed on account of pre ventative measures against swine fever. The following methods were applied CO2 98%, CO2/O-2 65/35%, T61(R) and pentobarbital (Euthesate(R)) injected i ntracardially. Intracardial injections of T61 and pentobarbital provide fast unconsciousne ss and death il with minimal discomfort to the animal.